Sentencing reform tests Cotton’s sway with Trump

Tom Cotton will do everything to defeat a last-ditch effort to pass condemnation reform before this year’s mid-term elections, hoping to win a High-stakes influence campaign over President Donald Trump on this issue.

Cotton is lambasting the proposal as “jailbreak”, which would “let serious criminals back on the road”, taking on an intimidating coalition fighting for the package that includes the cook political operation, White House adviser Jared Kushner and a number of powerful GOP senators. But cotton believes that, in the end, President Trump and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (r-Ky.) on his side.

Story Continues Below

“The President went to Singapore and agreed with the Singapore people that we should give the death penalty to drug dealers. I can’t imagine the President wants to reduce mandatory minimum sentences for drug dealers, ” the Arkansas Republican said in an interview. “I think, sen. McConnell shares my view that we should not let serious criminals out of prison, and we should not reduce the penalties for drug dealers.”

Even opponents of the judgment reform will privately admit it would probably happen if McConnell puts it on. But Cotton’s loud opposition can determine whether McConnell allowed even a vote given its reluctance to summon legislation that divides the conference-right before the election, not less.
Sign up for POLITICO Huddle

A daily play-by-play of Congress messages in your Inbox.

By registering, you agree to receive email newsletters or notifications from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

For cotton, the pressure to defeat a package of judgment reforms rolled into a popular prison reform is an important test of its influence with the President, who counts cotton as a close ally and consultant. Since joining Congress in 2012, Cotton’s opposition has proven to be the kiss of death for many high-profile bills: Comprehensive immigration reform, criminal justice reform, border adjustment tax and a cut-off immigration proposal this year.

Cotton earned himself powerful political enemies, such as the Koch political operation, which published a detailed fact-check rebutting Cotton Wall Street Journal op-ed, which attacked the new legislation as “soft on crime.”

“There is no evidence of what he says,” said Mark Holden, a top official at Koch Industries. “I’d like to see Sen. Cotton have a change of mind. But if not, I hope he’ll lose. Because he’s on the wrong side of history.”

The conflict is pitting some of the closest allies Trumps against each other. On the one hand, cotton and Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), who calls the conviction component “disturbing” and wants to focus on prison reform. On the other hand, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) who wants to go further in the Reform of criminal justice, but would be willing to accept the reduced proposal, and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R. S. C.), who supports it.
Chuck Schumer

“I understand [Cotton] concerns that they want to ensure that the reform does not cause people out of prison who should not get out. I just think it’s long overdue, ” said Graham. “And I’m a real guy.”

Although the President supported the standalone prison reform efforts, no one is quite sure where exactly Trump will come to the condemnation piece that will be added by Senate justice President Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Proponents of the condemnation reform hope that the President will provide crucial support to get legislation on the finish line after commuting the punishment of Alice Johnson for drug offenders, while opponents say he is unlikely to undermine his law-and-order persona.

Hogan Gidley, a spokesman for the White house, Trump said ” recognizes that there are some injustices in the system that should be fixed, and while he is receptive to the Senate’s proposed amendments to the bill, he will support only if the focus remains on cutting crime, reducing recidivism and the protection of the municipalities.”

Cotton attempts to enforce both on Trump and on his party’s leadership that the bill runs contrary to these guidelines. The proposal is expected to be published this month and would reduce the minimum mandatory penalties for non-violent drug offenders, give judges greater discretion in convictions and reduce the differences in convictions between crack and powder.

“There is no constituency, certainly among Republican voters, to let serious criminals out of prison or to cut their prison sentences,” Cotton said in interview. “It is poorly advised policy and even more poorly advised timing.”

Paul, another close trump ally countered with opposing views “ ” We have a lot of non-violent criminals in our prison, and they take up space that could be better put to for violent criminal.”

Cotton also has strong allies, including attorney General Jeff Sessions, who has long opposed far-reaching judgment reforms. The two have frustrated the people working on the bill.

However, many on the side of law enforcement agencies, an important trump card constituency, work with cotton. Jonathan Thompson, the managing Director of the National Sheriff Association, has spoken with the President twice about condemnation reform in the last one and a half years “ ” the President knows that we are concerned.”

“We think what he does is great. Sen. Cotton acknowledges that it is a very flawed bill, ” said Larry Quieter, President of the National Association of Assistant US Attorneys. “We hope that the President will not [approve].”
Republican Senate candidate Mike Braun

Unless Trump makes a great push for legislation and takes on his critics like cotton, there are many reasons for McConnell not to bring the bill before the election. It would probably take at least a week for the Senate to process, time that McConnell might think is better processed life judicial appointments spent before an uncertain interim result.

Besides, it would call an ugly Interparliamentary foodfight, squaring cotton with advocates of condemnation reform like Grassley, who has tweeted that the President ” wants to do something on prison/crim judicial reform. Me too.”

“The consensus is the prison reform stuff,” said Senate majority whip John Cornyn (R-Texas). “There are people who want to do more, but it’s the usual Problem: you want to try to do more and fail, or do you want to do, what is possible?”

Despite the long chances, the fight rages behind the scenes. Internal discussions on the subject were to lunch in the Senate heated up, according to Republican sources, a preview of what could happen on the Senate floor when the chamber takes it. It is the same dynamics that McConnell held from the levying of a larger penal justice reform package in 2016 as cotton against them railings and declared the United States has a ‘ under arrest problem.”

Trump ” s ” for prison reform, I am for prison reform. What I do not support is condemnation cuts under the guise of prison reform, and that is unfortunately what many senators are moving towards,” cotton said in interview.

A number of conservative senators have tacitly expressed their opposition to the judgment reform component, working according to groups to defeat it. But cotton has taken a greater risk by going forward to stop a bill that has not even produced.

“If you take a strong position in politics you have inherent risk,” said Jim Pasco, executive director at National Fraternal Order of Police, cotton. “Taking a position that we can do better, where we are now the most extreme, is worth a risk.”

Summary
Review Date
Reviewed Item
Sentencing reform tests Cotton’s sway with Trump
Author Rating
51star1star1star1star1star